Category talk:Disambiguation

A motion has been made to make punctuation consistent within disambig pages. Initial thoughts? Asara 02:20, 1 May 2008 (GMT)

Caps and brief info included on every term seems to be decided on. A decision about periods needs to be made; my opinion is that they should be there. Finally, the opening sentence needs to be consistent; I like "<term> can refer to any of the following:", with "any" possibly being replaced with "either" when there are only two pages within the disambiguation. Disambig notes on content pages also need to be made uniform; "This article is about <whatever>. For other uses, please see <term> (disambiguation)." is good, and the "please" is optional. --Krypton 03:37, 1 May 2008 (GMT)

Do we really need this page? If you want a full list of disambiguation pages, you can just use this. ~Soludra 07:54, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

To add to that, it would be easy to remove this category, since every single page includes Template:Disambig. Just remove the Category:Disambiguation from the template, and delete the category page itself. ~Soludra 07:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Coming back to this: Yay? Nay? Soludra 10:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

I actually use the disambig category, and from the stand point of a non-chronicler, I like being able to see what other sorts of disambigs exist. Asara 14:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Since posting this, I've seen the light. It's definitely a fair bit nicer than the WhatLinksHere page. ~Soludra 23:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC)