Difference between revisions of "Talk:Noxuron"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(answer) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:If we assume he has a further, lore-worthy role to play in the future, then I think yes. (His story certainly doesn't seem to be over yet, does it?) --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 21:30, 19 November 2007 (GMT) | :If we assume he has a further, lore-worthy role to play in the future, then I think yes. (His story certainly doesn't seem to be over yet, does it?) --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 21:30, 19 November 2007 (GMT) | ||
::Well, by that logic I'd say EVERY article in here needs "edit needed". =P If we're up to date as far as we can go, I'd say remove it. When new information is revealed, we add it then. In the meantime, if there is nothing to add, we're set. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 04:42, 20 November 2007 (GMT) | ::Well, by that logic I'd say EVERY article in here needs "edit needed". =P If we're up to date as far as we can go, I'd say remove it. When new information is revealed, we add it then. In the meantime, if there is nothing to add, we're set. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 04:42, 20 November 2007 (GMT) | ||
::Agreed with Asara and edited to reflect it. [[User:Corvax|Corvax]] 09:28, 20 November 2007 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 09:28, 20 November 2007
Is the edit needed category still needed? Asara 19:15, 19 November 2007 (GMT)
- If we assume he has a further, lore-worthy role to play in the future, then I think yes. (His story certainly doesn't seem to be over yet, does it?) --Krypton 21:30, 19 November 2007 (GMT)
- Well, by that logic I'd say EVERY article in here needs "edit needed". =P If we're up to date as far as we can go, I'd say remove it. When new information is revealed, we add it then. In the meantime, if there is nothing to add, we're set. Asara 04:42, 20 November 2007 (GMT)
- Agreed with Asara and edited to reflect it. Corvax 09:28, 20 November 2007 (GMT)