Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fellowship of Explorers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (answer) |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Is there a reason Gheladan was left out? --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 13:55, 20 April 2008 (GMT) | Is there a reason Gheladan was left out? --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 13:55, 20 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
:Actually, in general, isn't it enough to just say and link "newbie areas"? --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 14:01, 20 April 2008 (GMT) | :Actually, in general, isn't it enough to just say and link "newbie areas"? --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 14:01, 20 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
:Yep! I was going too quickly and put Gorshire instead of Gheladan. Also, it's enough to just link "newbie areas", but in the spirit of not copying the help scroll exactly, I wanted the lore to be more thorough. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 15:37, 20 April 2008 (GMT) |
Latest revision as of 15:37, 20 April 2008
There was an image on this page, but I don't know how to align it to the right. This was the image:
Are you sure about the stockrooms not counting? Last I checked, stockrooms counted towards explorers rankings. Cypra 19:52, 19 December 2006 (GMT)
Only Denizen shop stockrooms don't count. Player-owned shop stockrooms do count. Gnaash 22:11, 19 December 2006 (GMT)
Is there a reason Gheladan was left out? --Krypton 13:55, 20 April 2008 (GMT)
- Actually, in general, isn't it enough to just say and link "newbie areas"? --Krypton 14:01, 20 April 2008 (GMT)
- Yep! I was going too quickly and put Gorshire instead of Gheladan. Also, it's enough to just link "newbie areas", but in the spirit of not copying the help scroll exactly, I wanted the lore to be more thorough. Asara 15:37, 20 April 2008 (GMT)