Difference between revisions of "Talk:Forests"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Fixed the forest thing) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Delphinus: Yeah, I noticed that if you try to label a link to a category, the entire link disappears. So, you have to have either the raw link name, or none at all. Anyone know how to remedy this? | Delphinus: Yeah, I noticed that if you try to label a link to a category, the entire link disappears. So, you have to have either the raw link name, or none at all. Anyone know how to remedy this? | ||
:Hey, fixed it. I just opened the link in a new window, edited it, and removed the redirect link. There's no content there (I don't have time to put anything in, sorry!) so you'll have to fill it in yourself. Also, remember to use four tildes to sign your comments, and use <nowiki>:</nowiki>s to indent replies! [[User:Valeo|Valeo]] 06:50, 3 Jul 2005 (GMT) |
Revision as of 06:50, 3 July 2005
Blargh. I was trying to do a redirect, so that if for some reason you linked to [[forests]] it would just go to [[Category:Forests]] instead. But when you follow the link to forests you don't quite get the same thing as if you went directly to the category. Greyda 01:56, 3 Jul 2005 (GMT)
Delphinus: Yeah, I noticed that if you try to label a link to a category, the entire link disappears. So, you have to have either the raw link name, or none at all. Anyone know how to remedy this?
- Hey, fixed it. I just opened the link in a new window, edited it, and removed the redirect link. There's no content there (I don't have time to put anything in, sorry!) so you'll have to fill it in yourself. Also, remember to use four tildes to sign your comments, and use :s to indent replies! Valeo 06:50, 3 Jul 2005 (GMT)