Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Humgii"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m (correctly signing) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
As per the topic on the forums, I'll be reverting these to Category:Denizens '''''again''''', but I want to hold off until we know whether Humgii should be both Denizen and Domesticated animal. Regardless of how Creatures' and Denizens' articles declare themselves mutually exclusive, I think Humgii are the exception. Just waiting on posts/comments here/there, that way we don't have to do twice as many edits... ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 04:20, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | As per the topic on the forums, I'll be reverting these to Category:Denizens '''''again''''', but I want to hold off until we know whether Humgii should be both Denizen and Domesticated animal. Regardless of how Creatures' and Denizens' articles declare themselves mutually exclusive, I think Humgii are the exception. Just waiting on posts/comments here/there, that way we don't have to do twice as many edits... ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 04:20, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Well, technically speaking, that would open up quite a definitional conundrum... [[User:Asara|Asara]] | :Well, technically speaking, that would open up quite a definitional conundrum... [[User:Asara|Asara]] 12:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:27, 11 September 2008
As per the topic on the forums, I'll be reverting these to Category:Denizens again, but I want to hold off until we know whether Humgii should be both Denizen and Domesticated animal. Regardless of how Creatures' and Denizens' articles declare themselves mutually exclusive, I think Humgii are the exception. Just waiting on posts/comments here/there, that way we don't have to do twice as many edits... ~Soludra 04:20, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- Well, technically speaking, that would open up quite a definitional conundrum... Asara 12:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC)