Talk:Ram's Horn (disambiguation)

Possible non-disambiguation pages + comments:

• ram's horn (artefact) - this one should be straightforward
• ram's horns - possibly for the giant, public kind, but what if we should want this to be a page that redirects to the disambigation?
• ram's horn (insert your idea for the giant, public kind here) - *rally*

--Krypton 14:48, 3 April 2008 (GMT)

Maybe Ram's horn (public) or Ram's horn (object)? I do think Ram's horns (and singular) should be redirect to the disambig *nod*. ~Soludra 17:25, 3 April 2008 (GMT)

If we choose to, yes Ram's horn should redirect to the disambig and "Ram's horn (public)" is fine, but I'm not completely sold on it. Personally, I don't mind leaving Ram's horn the way it is and having people use the disambig note at the top of the article to get to the artefact. Asara 23:06, 3 April 2008 (GMT)

Mm, I like that last idea. The horn artefact is just a portable version of the others scattered around anyways; they're not even as separate as the gold commodity and the gold currency. ~Soludra 01:25, 4 April 2008 (GMT)

I'm not sure what that "last idea" suggests, though. Do you mean leaving ram's horn the page for the non-portable ones, and using a disambig note on that page to come to the disambiguation page, which would then link to a ram's horn (artefact) page? If I interpreted that correctly, then the portable and non-portable horns are still getting different pages, which is good, but now the general rule that search terms that match the disambiguation lead to the disambiguation page isn't being met, which is not good (if not necessarily very bad *shrug*). I think it's time for another picture, Asara.. --Krypton 02:53, 4 April 2008 (GMT)

No, I think she meant that there would be a note at the top of Ram's horn saying that there's an artefact called the rams horn at Ram's horn (artefact). There would be no actual disambiguation page involved. ~Soludra 03:01, 4 April 2008 (GMT)