Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dracolich"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
technically the dracolich is a sentient being. A combination of its nature as a lich, and the fact that it has spoken before. But Bella's dragon speaks too so take that with a grain of salt. --{{User:Askiva/sig1}} 01:57, 16 October 2007 (GMT) | technically the dracolich is a sentient being. A combination of its nature as a lich, and the fact that it has spoken before. But Bella's dragon speaks too so take that with a grain of salt. --{{User:Askiva/sig1}} 01:57, 16 October 2007 (GMT) | ||
Let me clarify that... The thing's name isn't dracolich, so it's title isn't skeletal, it's merely a dracolich, sentient or not. [[User:Corvax|Corvax]] 02:07, 16 October 2007 (GMT) |
Latest revision as of 02:07, 16 October 2007
Regarding the title, that is a creature and the bolded part isn't a proper title, generally it's a proper title of a named denizen that is bolded. This is just a creature, the same goes for the kirin. Corvax 15:34, 15 October 2007 (GMT)
- You can send it tells (as opposed to the "Only alive, sentient beings can receive tells." response when trying to tell to things that are clearly creatures); it says "I have nothing to sell" when asked for wares (as opposed to "[definite creature, not a denizen for sure] has nothing to sell to you" - no talking!).. I'd call that sentience (characteristic only of denizens), wouldn't you? I wasn't the first to categorize city guardians as denizens, by the way. And Asara mentioned that any word that appears in INFO HERE ought to be bolded. --Krypton 20:27, 15 October 2007 (GMT)
- Hm, I meant titles that appear in INFO HERE that don't necessarily show up in QL. =) At the moment though, I don't care either way we decide to do this. Asara 00:31, 16 October 2007 (GMT)
technically the dracolich is a sentient being. A combination of its nature as a lich, and the fact that it has spoken before. But Bella's dragon speaks too so take that with a grain of salt. --Askiva @ 01:57, 16 October 2007 (GMT)
Let me clarify that... The thing's name isn't dracolich, so it's title isn't skeletal, it's merely a dracolich, sentient or not. Corvax 02:07, 16 October 2007 (GMT)