Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kirin"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Agreed. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 15:45, 15 October 2007 (GMT) | Agreed. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 15:45, 15 October 2007 (GMT) | ||
:I'm just saying, if they don't resummon it, can something dead still be considered a "city guardian"? The ruling was, for instance, that dead "denizens" arn't denizens anymore, solely historical figures. And as per the explanation on dracolich, all city guardians are denizens. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 20:30, 15 October 2007 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 20:30, 15 October 2007
Needs real title (I believe it is "a shimmering kirin") and re-categorisation (Historical Figures unless Shallam resummons it). --Krypton 02:19, 15 October 2007 (GMT)
Unless they've changed their city-guardian to something else in the mean time, it's still their city-guardian. Otherwise your going to be switching it back and forth all the time. You're getting recat happy. Corvax 15:10, 15 October 2007 (GMT)
Agreed. Asara 15:45, 15 October 2007 (GMT)
- I'm just saying, if they don't resummon it, can something dead still be considered a "city guardian"? The ruling was, for instance, that dead "denizens" arn't denizens anymore, solely historical figures. And as per the explanation on dracolich, all city guardians are denizens. --Krypton 20:30, 15 October 2007 (GMT)