Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Seafaring Specialists"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (feedback needed) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
With regards to the recent edits of the Ambo article, we've to finalize policy concerning location disclosure. As the HELP SEAFARING SPECIALISTS scroll states that "their locations are not always so well known", should we remove the locations of the other four as well, or what? I think it would be a disservice to remove some of them, though, in relation to other facets of the denizen. Opinions? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 15:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | With regards to the recent edits of the Ambo article, we've to finalize policy concerning location disclosure. As the HELP SEAFARING SPECIALISTS scroll states that "their locations are not always so well known", should we remove the locations of the other four as well, or what? I think it would be a disservice to remove some of them, though, in relation to other facets of the denizen. Opinions? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 15:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Bump. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 15:37, 8 January 2009 (UTC) | :Bump. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 15:37, 8 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Hm. On one hand, we have a page about most every denizen, significant or not, on the Archives. On the other, the scroll lists their names but not their locations, and it does indeed do them a disservice to hide their location on their record. So it is easy for someone to connect the name to the Archive record. My views are that it's not such a big secret. Anyone can find out their locations and announce them to the world. It's not hard to ask someone via Market. Personally, I'm for listing the specialists' locations in their respective articles because of this. Anyone can find out very easily, not like hidden Order mechanics or internal House structure. [[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 09:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
I'd say it's a bit late by now, anyone can view page history. Personally I want the location in there. This is meant to be a collection of knowledge, not a mimic of the help files. --[[User:Kunama|Kunama]] 15:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Sounds good to me. Makes sense that the wiki would be a go-to place for information. (!) I'll put the locations back in, thanks! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 16:18, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:18, 9 January 2009
With regards to the recent edits of the Ambo article, we've to finalize policy concerning location disclosure. As the HELP SEAFARING SPECIALISTS scroll states that "their locations are not always so well known", should we remove the locations of the other four as well, or what? I think it would be a disservice to remove some of them, though, in relation to other facets of the denizen. Opinions? Asara 15:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Bump. Asara 15:37, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hm. On one hand, we have a page about most every denizen, significant or not, on the Archives. On the other, the scroll lists their names but not their locations, and it does indeed do them a disservice to hide their location on their record. So it is easy for someone to connect the name to the Archive record. My views are that it's not such a big secret. Anyone can find out their locations and announce them to the world. It's not hard to ask someone via Market. Personally, I'm for listing the specialists' locations in their respective articles because of this. Anyone can find out very easily, not like hidden Order mechanics or internal House structure. Soludra 09:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
I'd say it's a bit late by now, anyone can view page history. Personally I want the location in there. This is meant to be a collection of knowledge, not a mimic of the help files. --Kunama 15:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. Makes sense that the wiki would be a go-to place for information. (!) I'll put the locations back in, thanks! Asara 16:18, 9 January 2009 (UTC)