Talk:Hashan

---

The Triad of the Night- Would it really have been created in 222 AF? That's certainly when Twilight became patron, but Elentari did not become Lady Ourania (1/3rd of the Triad) until 248 AF, and Valnurana (the other third) wasn't hailed as overlooking the city until 274 AF. --Valkyre 00:25, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Amended the wording to address your concern. --Krypton 10:08, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

---

Hashan's Patrons... These are wrong, particularly the dates of patrons between Ourania, Thoth, and Twilight. Bluef

---

Dates of Hashan's Seneschals... I have been using the Hashan boards for the dates, usually the post where the next person is first mentioned to have taken over, or a post from the previous down where they state they are stepping down Aliath

---

REFERENCES:

• Public News 2707 from Sarapis explains Hashan's expansion, and in 2718 Gaia responds to Hashan for the incident. Madelyne 21:03, 3 April 2007 (GMT)

---

These denizens were destroyed by Mukamuttara (who was also destroyed herself). Not entirely sure if they belong on the inhabitants list (or the denizen one) anymore:

• Lunar Mystic
• Nightwatcher
• Sarsarin
• star-strider

Also "a vicious Setontot" is an animal in our Menagerie. The other animals were listed there so I didn't include it on the inhabitants listing either (should it be on denizens?) Finally, I think our only prostitute is Kaethryn. Should they be removed from the denizen list as well?

Previous was written by Bluef.

If the being was destroyed and no longer exists, it would belong in the historical figures category. Any "<area> Denizen" category should only include current denizens (unless specified otherwise). A Sentontot is more of a creature than a denizen (it is not sentient), so it would belong in the creatures category and not the denizen category (or the inhabitants list). The prostitutes question is a bit tougher - I would probably leave it in the denizen list as the category is appropriate for the prostitutes article itself (Kaethryn being a prostitute). Asara 03:52, 13 July 2007 (GMT)

The laws of Hashan are searchable...should the Great Canon of Hashan in the infobox be internally linked? -- Bluef

The recent Seneschal list is from my own notes, but I'm not sure how accurate it is - would be worth double-checking at some point. Asara 16:22, 19 November 2007 (GMT)

I unfortunately do not remember how to edit the infoboxes... if someone could fix the city_infobox, the "Heraldic Arms" parameter is incorrectly spelled on every city page (there should be no second r). Thanks! Asara 18:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Got it. Corvax 16:34, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

---

The best conundrum is whether Hashan itself floats or not. We can't figure it out. Somebody of the future, please clarify it. Grif -- 12/06/2022

• There was a [forums discussion] about it and I think the concensus is that Hashan does not float. The area around it was obliterated but the city base was mostly untouched (solid) and its foundation is now a weird pedestal in the center of canyonlike deadlands (the sunderlands). There's eerie floating rocks and thats about it. Tibitha made a cool rough [sketch] based on room descs -Halos (talk)

To answer a previous question first, Hashan indeed does not float. The city itself sits upon a large isolated pillar in the middle of a grand crevasse. There are large floating rocks within the sunderlands that create a path (in the lore the path also shifts with the rocks but that isnt the case mechanically) to the city. How the Kartha managed to sail a ship through the sunderlands to Hashan shall remain a mystery. On another note, i've added the planetarium to the city's facilities and landmarks as well as more info on the lab. Asmodron, June 17 2024, 12:00 GMT

• TIL Kartha mastered magical gravity-defying ships to do radical ollies in the Sunderland half pipes all up on Hashan's face for a year. Who knew they were chill like that -Halos (talk) 02:12, 18 June 2024 (UTC)