Difference between revisions of "Talk:Anton"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I dunno to be honest. He doesn't really look lich-like. he's not even rotting. I'd remove it since he's not explicitely stated as one. - [[User:Skye|Skyepie]] 04:32, 5 November 2006 (GMT) | I dunno to be honest. He doesn't really look lich-like. he's not even rotting. I'd remove it since he's not explicitely stated as one. - [[User:Skye|Skyepie]] 04:32, 5 November 2006 (GMT) | ||
In the effort to safeguard quest info, why was Anton removed only from [[:Category:Liches]] and not [[:Category:Undead]], too? --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 19:23, 24 January 2008 (GMT) | |||
:Yes, Undead category should have been removed also and I have done so now. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 20:30, 24 January 2008 (GMT) |
Latest revision as of 20:30, 24 January 2008
Should this be here? This seems like it is basically quest info. Anton shouldn't be lsited as anything more than an astronomer. Keeping it up until I am sure.
Cypra 05:02, 31 October 2006 (GMT)
well, he's got an alchemy lab in his observatory so I suppose it's not really quest info... - Skyepie 11:20, 1 November 2006 (GMT)
I mean the lich part. Is that common knowledge enough? Cypra 22:36, 1 November 2006 (GMT)
I dunno to be honest. He doesn't really look lich-like. he's not even rotting. I'd remove it since he's not explicitely stated as one. - Skyepie 04:32, 5 November 2006 (GMT)
In the effort to safeguard quest info, why was Anton removed only from Category:Liches and not Category:Undead, too? --Krypton 19:23, 24 January 2008 (GMT)
- Yes, Undead category should have been removed also and I have done so now. Asara 20:30, 24 January 2008 (GMT)