Difference between revisions of "Talk:Oversoul"

1,123 bytes added ,  05:34, 23 April 2008
no edit summary
m
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
Then should this page mention that its an occultic concept? --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 04:58, 23 April 2008 (GMT)
Then should this page mention that its an occultic concept? --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 04:58, 23 April 2008 (GMT)
:Events post #55, "Dissolution of the Infernals Guild", says nothing about the Oversoul. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 05:10, 23 April 2008 (GMT)
:Events post #55, "Dissolution of the Infernals Guild", says nothing about the Oversoul. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 05:10, 23 April 2008 (GMT)
::The wording doesn't really touch on whether it's a Real Concept (Gods-confirmed, etc.) or just an occultic theory. Still, since the only historical mention of it does have to do with the occult, it seems reasonable to at least put a word in about that. Perhaps Delphinus has looked it up somewhere else, and would know more?
::I'm looking through the histories and don't see anything else in there, either. Whatever it really is, the Oversoul isn't terribly well-researched. . . . — [[User:Kenner|Kenner]] 05:13, 23 April 2008 (GMT)
::No, it's only mentioned in the [http://www.achaea.com/history.php histories] once, in the place I've already cited. So much for that. — [[User:Kenner|Kenner]] 05:19, 23 April 2008 (GMT)
:I would definitely include that the conceptual word stems from occult (Occult?) lore. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 05:29, 23 April 2008 (GMT)
::So I've linked it to "Occultist" (the class) at the moment. If we find that it is a concept forged by the Occultist Guild, linking to the Occultists House may be an appropriate course of action. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 05:34, 23 April 2008 (GMT)
1,131

edits