Difference between revisions of "Talk:Credibility"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
4/20/17:11 Regarding issue #48215: Sorry, we do not give out that information. Thank you. | 4/20/17:11 Regarding issue #48215: Sorry, we do not give out that information. Thank you. | ||
:Looks like we're on our own! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 17:14, 20 April 2008 (GMT) | :Looks like we're on our own! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 17:14, 20 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
::So, uh.. who wants to start spewing OOC phlegm in-realms and keep track of the rankings as they proceed down through them? --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 17:16, 20 April 2008 (GMT) | |||
HELP CREDIBILITY also mentions "He is of acceptable character", instead of "He is AN acceptable character". A typo report I submitted left that bit unchanged, so it could be right, though that would be best confirmed if we could find someone with that current rank... --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 00:46, 21 April 2008 (GMT) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:46, 21 April 2008
"Acceptable character" is better than "credible character"? --Krypton 14:12, 20 April 2008 (GMT)
- Regarding the above question and the 'shamefully weak' placement:
Message #13351 Sent by Anytus 4/20/17:11 Regarding issue #48215: Sorry, we do not give out that information. Thank you.
- Looks like we're on our own! Asara 17:14, 20 April 2008 (GMT)
- So, uh.. who wants to start spewing OOC phlegm in-realms and keep track of the rankings as they proceed down through them? --Krypton 17:16, 20 April 2008 (GMT)
HELP CREDIBILITY also mentions "He is of acceptable character", instead of "He is AN acceptable character". A typo report I submitted left that bit unchanged, so it could be right, though that would be best confirmed if we could find someone with that current rank... --Krypton 00:46, 21 April 2008 (GMT)