1,131
edits
Talk:DeSangre: Difference between revisions
more comments
No edit summary |
(more comments) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If Nicator, Artaius, Selicande, and Piraeus are known deSangres, why isn't that reflected in their article names and bold? --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 00:01, 12 April 2008 (GMT) | If Nicator, Artaius, Selicande, and Piraeus are known deSangres, why isn't that reflected in their article names and bold? --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 00:01, 12 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
:How are they reflected in the literature? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 00:07, 12 April 2008 (GMT) | :How are they reflected in the literature? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 00:07, 12 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
::I don't know. I never heard of them being deSangres before. But if they are, that will have to be added. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 00:10, 12 April 2008 (GMT) | |||
I think the fact that Valerias, Catarin, etc. are ultimately descended from Nicator led to the assumption that Nicator and his immediate descendents were "deSangres", which is not a safe conclusion. The surname, for instance, could have come from a family that married into the royal line descending from Nicator. Should Nicator, Piraeus, Selicande, etc. be removed from this page? --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 05:28, 24 April 2008 (GMT) | |||