Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Herbs"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Having all the herbs categorised as either annual or perennial makes categorising them all in [[:Category:Herbs]] a violation of LCD. Something to correct, or leave alone? --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 20:56, 5 January 2008 (GMT) | Having all the herbs categorised as either annual or perennial makes categorising them all in [[:Category:Herbs]] a violation of LCD. Something to correct, or leave alone? --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 20:56, 5 January 2008 (GMT) | ||
:Yes. Fix! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 22:41, 5 January 2008 (GMT) | :Yes. Fix! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 22:41, 5 January 2008 (GMT) | ||
::I suggest at least now linking to [[:Category:Herbs]] in the article bodies. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 22:55, 5 January 2008 (GMT) | |||
:::It doesn't matter either way. Whatever you prefer. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 00:18, 6 January 2008 (GMT) | |||
::::A bit late. It's already been done! :D --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 00:26, 6 January 2008 (GMT) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:26, 6 January 2008
Having all the herbs categorised as either annual or perennial makes categorising them all in Category:Herbs a violation of LCD. Something to correct, or leave alone? --Krypton 20:56, 5 January 2008 (GMT)
- Yes. Fix! Asara 22:41, 5 January 2008 (GMT)
- I suggest at least now linking to Category:Herbs in the article bodies. --Krypton 22:55, 5 January 2008 (GMT)