Difference between revisions of "Talk:Noxuron"

From AchaeaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
"The twisted form of Noxuron still bears many characteristics of the sons of Lord Aegis, the plate armour of his former life clinging to his frame. A single horn arcs upwards from the top of this daemons skull, a fine mist swirling around the apex of the spiked appendage. Cruelty evident in his coarse expression, a pair of blazing crimson orbs peer out from his face, his blackened lips curled back in a smug sneer to reveal a gaping maw of razor teeth. Towering to titanic heights, his scaled black skin bulges out with thick muscles and bears upon it an intricate set of scars and tattoos. A pair of leathery wings juts outward from his shoulders, drooping to his feet, ghostly white and laced with thin veins of blood. The jagged claws of a demon curve from each club-like hand, the cruel weapons gleaming with patches of emerald and crimson streaks. Lord Noxuron, the Dreamscourge does not even register your presence as a threat."
Is the edit needed category still needed? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 19:15, 19 November 2007 (GMT)
:Description for later reference. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 18:58, 12 August 2007 (GMT)
:If we assume he has a further, lore-worthy role to play in the future, then I think yes. (His story certainly doesn't seem to be over yet, does it?) --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 21:30, 19 November 2007 (GMT)
::Well, by that logic I'd say EVERY article in here needs "edit needed". =P If we're up to date as far as we can go, I'd say remove it. When new information is revealed, we add it then. In the meantime, if there is nothing to add, we're set. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 04:42, 20 November 2007 (GMT)
::Agreed with Asara and edited to reflect it. [[User:Corvax|Corvax]] 09:28, 20 November 2007 (GMT)
:::For one, I think the page needs more information on his whereabouts and aspirations; possibly dates, too. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 12:06, 20 November 2007 (GMT)

Latest revision as of 12:06, 20 November 2007

Is the edit needed category still needed? Asara 19:15, 19 November 2007 (GMT)

If we assume he has a further, lore-worthy role to play in the future, then I think yes. (His story certainly doesn't seem to be over yet, does it?) --Krypton 21:30, 19 November 2007 (GMT)
Well, by that logic I'd say EVERY article in here needs "edit needed". =P If we're up to date as far as we can go, I'd say remove it. When new information is revealed, we add it then. In the meantime, if there is nothing to add, we're set. Asara 04:42, 20 November 2007 (GMT)
Agreed with Asara and edited to reflect it. Corvax 09:28, 20 November 2007 (GMT)
For one, I think the page needs more information on his whereabouts and aspirations; possibly dates, too. --Krypton 12:06, 20 November 2007 (GMT)