1,131
edits
Category talk:Pending Deletion: Difference between revisions
Category talk:Pending Deletion (view source)
Revision as of 04:20, 27 January 2008
, 27 January 2008how did that get there?
(on Korkill and Bailin) |
m (how did that get there?) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
article, such as a city article, instead. Also consider other categories such as the Historical Figures category. | article, such as a city article, instead. Also consider other categories such as the Historical Figures category. | ||
:the Korkill and Bailin articles ought to be deleted. In all honesty, from room descriptions alone, we don't even know if they are "alive", and thus we don't know whether they should be categorised as denizens or historical figures. I suggest just having the two of them mentioned in passing on the Ashtan page (as they are now) and leave it at that. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 22:35, 1 January 2008 (GMT) | :the Korkill and Bailin articles ought to be deleted. In all honesty, from room descriptions alone, we don't even know if they are "alive", and thus we don't know whether they should be categorised as denizens or historical figures. I suggest just having the two of them mentioned in passing on the Ashtan page (as they are now) and leave it at that. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 22:35, 1 January 2008 (GMT) | ||
---- | |||
When a page is deleted, is the option presented of also deleting the associated Talk page (like it is to move an associated Talk page when you move an article)? --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 21:57, 26 January 2008 (GMT) | |||
:I don't think so, it should just destroy them, but it doesn't, which is lame. --[[User:Corvax|Corvax]] 22:45, 26 January 2008 (GMT) | |||
::There are sadly still countless of parent-page-less Talks out there. I guess at least now we know to keep that from growing. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 23:00, 26 January 2008 (GMT) | |||