Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dowager Montagenet"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(hermione?) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Above question still unanswered! Also, why was the last change needed, Dowager is a title and not the woman's name. Why push it down to the bottom as an after effect. I don't understand why it should be discarded and rewritten as historical since she's still Eliza Montagenet. [[User:Corvax|Corvax]] 05:46, 3 December 2007 (GMT) | Above question still unanswered! Also, why was the last change needed, Dowager is a title and not the woman's name. Why push it down to the bottom as an after effect. I don't understand why it should be discarded and rewritten as historical since she's still Eliza Montagenet. [[User:Corvax|Corvax]] 05:46, 3 December 2007 (GMT) | ||
:I just worked backwards. Since policy is that the bolded part of the article be the denizen's "true" (i.e. INFOHERE) name, and the article title shouldn't contain more information than the bold does, that resulted in titling the page Dowager Montagenet. You can't figure out her first name is Eliza just from looking/speaking with her (you can't even refer to her as Eliza in says or tells), so to some degree it is "historical" in requiring you delve into the past in order to know. As for placement, I wasn't suggesting the first name tidbit was unimportant; that just seemed to be a less awkward integration of it when I changed it. Opening the article with "Dowager Montagenet, also know as Eliza Montagenet, ..." would be fine, of course, too. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 13:32, 3 December 2007 (GMT) | :I just worked backwards. Since policy is that the bolded part of the article be the denizen's "true" (i.e. INFOHERE) name, and the article title shouldn't contain more information than the bold does, that resulted in titling the page Dowager Montagenet. You can't figure out her first name is Eliza just from looking/speaking with her (you can't even refer to her as Eliza in says or tells), so to some degree it is "historical" in requiring you delve into the past in order to know. As for placement, I wasn't suggesting the first name tidbit was unimportant; that just seemed to be a less awkward integration of it when I changed it. Opening the article with "Dowager Montagenet, also know as Eliza Montagenet, ..." would be fine, of course, too. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 13:32, 3 December 2007 (GMT) | ||
== hermione? == | |||
In the verbose description of the Nicator Archives it describes the library as being matroned by Hermione Montagenet. | |||
Most other references mention Eliza instead, of course, but are there any other mentions of Hermione or is the nicator archives the lone exception? [[User:Paine|Paine]] 18:38, 14 February 2008 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 18:38, 14 February 2008
Did it actually ever say what was used to make Gleam? I don't remember anything mentioning specifics like that. Corvax 13:34, 13 July 2007 (GMT)
- Not on the newsboards (though that's what it sounds like was suggested). Whoever was present with the Dowager when she snapped out of her trance might've heard the details on the content of gleam, so that may be where the info came from. --Krypton 13:32, 3 December 2007 (GMT)
Above question still unanswered! Also, why was the last change needed, Dowager is a title and not the woman's name. Why push it down to the bottom as an after effect. I don't understand why it should be discarded and rewritten as historical since she's still Eliza Montagenet. Corvax 05:46, 3 December 2007 (GMT)
- I just worked backwards. Since policy is that the bolded part of the article be the denizen's "true" (i.e. INFOHERE) name, and the article title shouldn't contain more information than the bold does, that resulted in titling the page Dowager Montagenet. You can't figure out her first name is Eliza just from looking/speaking with her (you can't even refer to her as Eliza in says or tells), so to some degree it is "historical" in requiring you delve into the past in order to know. As for placement, I wasn't suggesting the first name tidbit was unimportant; that just seemed to be a less awkward integration of it when I changed it. Opening the article with "Dowager Montagenet, also know as Eliza Montagenet, ..." would be fine, of course, too. --Krypton 13:32, 3 December 2007 (GMT)
hermione?
In the verbose description of the Nicator Archives it describes the library as being matroned by Hermione Montagenet.
Most other references mention Eliza instead, of course, but are there any other mentions of Hermione or is the nicator archives the lone exception? Paine 18:38, 14 February 2008 (GMT)