Difference between revisions of "Talk:Charter of Oakstone"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:::Following what Krypton said, perhaps this should be moved to '''Charter of Oakstone'''? ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 07:30, 2 April 2008 (GMT) | :::Following what Krypton said, perhaps this should be moved to '''Charter of Oakstone'''? ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 07:30, 2 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
::::If no one objects. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 15:08, 2 April 2008 (GMT) | ::::If no one objects. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 15:08, 2 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
:::::Fixed. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 00:23, 3 April 2008 (GMT) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:23, 3 April 2008
Is Demeter still in charge of Oakstone? --Kunama 00:34, 26 February 2007 (GMT)
Bumping it up so people don't lose the question in the spam. Corvax 10:49, 26 February 2007 (GMT)
When I was forest enemied, I'm fairly sure that Jym mentioned discussing my terms with Melantha, come to think of it. Lynna 22:10, 26 February 2007 (GMT)
You're asking if a now non-existent deity is still in charge of an org?! Yeah, Melantha and Lupus are the divine that deal with Oakstone nowadays. --Tasshya 11:00, 1 March 2007 (GMT)
If this is verbatim, it's probably fine. Though one has to wonder which edition out of the many in the realms we should go by... --Krypton 10:22, 1 April 2008 (GMT)
- The most current one? Asara 14:52, 1 April 2008 (GMT)
- Each forestal House has its own "copy" (via House help scrolls), and since they are free to be edited by House officials, they may differ between the Houses. Then there is also the "official" heavy tome at Central Oak that also holds the Charter of Oakstone (which is, by the way, its real name, not "Oakstone Charter"), but if that one has changed to reflect new policies, I don't know. --Krypton 14:55, 1 April 2008 (GMT)