Difference between revisions of "Talk:Foozle"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Commenting) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
It seems only living creatures can be foozled (I bugged not being able to foozle a statue, though it was listed, and was told this), but the "mostly creatures and denizens" bit seems to imply there are some being that are not living that are foozle'able. That should probably be rephrased... ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 02:55, 5 April 2008 (GMT) | It seems only living creatures can be foozled (I bugged not being able to foozle a statue, though it was listed, and was told this), but the "mostly creatures and denizens" bit seems to imply there are some being that are not living that are foozle'able. That should probably be rephrased... ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 02:55, 5 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
:Yes, that is how foozle works. Yes, I agree the wording of "items" could perhaps be done without. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 03:00, 5 April 2008 (GMT) | |||
::Removed "mostly". [[User:Asara|Asara]] 03:02, 5 April 2008 (GMT) |
Latest revision as of 03:02, 5 April 2008
Not deleting this, even though it is blank, since it does need filling in. Cypra 09:03, 12 January 2007 (GMT)
Perhaps the list of items is inappropriate? Not sure if people should find them out on their own?
Added it/deleted it. Blargh!
It seems only living creatures can be foozled (I bugged not being able to foozle a statue, though it was listed, and was told this), but the "mostly creatures and denizens" bit seems to imply there are some being that are not living that are foozle'able. That should probably be rephrased... ~Soludra 02:55, 5 April 2008 (GMT)