Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Herbs"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Yes. Fix! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 22:41, 5 January 2008 (GMT) | :Yes. Fix! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 22:41, 5 January 2008 (GMT) | ||
::I suggest at least now linking to [[:Category:Herbs]] in the article bodies. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 22:55, 5 January 2008 (GMT) | ::I suggest at least now linking to [[:Category:Herbs]] in the article bodies. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 22:55, 5 January 2008 (GMT) | ||
:::It doesn't matter either way. Whatever you prefer. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 00:18, 6 January 2008 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 00:18, 6 January 2008
Having all the herbs categorised as either annual or perennial makes categorising them all in Category:Herbs a violation of LCD. Something to correct, or leave alone? --Krypton 20:56, 5 January 2008 (GMT)
- Yes. Fix! Asara 22:41, 5 January 2008 (GMT)
- I suggest at least now linking to Category:Herbs in the article bodies. --Krypton 22:55, 5 January 2008 (GMT)
- It doesn't matter either way. Whatever you prefer. Asara 00:18, 6 January 2008 (GMT)
- I suggest at least now linking to Category:Herbs in the article bodies. --Krypton 22:55, 5 January 2008 (GMT)