Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Documents"

no edit summary
(answer)
Line 4: Line 4:
:::I dunno, I've got typos in adventurer-tailored clothes changed before, and these documents ''are'' public or 'official' ones. I will likely file an issue to ask about this, though, if that makes you feel any better. Not just entering ''TYPO The spelling in Cyrene's laws is terrible!!'' or putting them in one by tiny one.
:::I dunno, I've got typos in adventurer-tailored clothes changed before, and these documents ''are'' public or 'official' ones. I will likely file an issue to ask about this, though, if that makes you feel any better. Not just entering ''TYPO The spelling in Cyrene's laws is terrible!!'' or putting them in one by tiny one.
:::Still, even if the typos aren't fixed, should we really keep them in there? Consistency is important, but the changes were quite minor. Yes, it's the principle of the thing, but ... Meh. If you/Head Chroniclers don't want it changed, though, I'll gladly revert what I did! — [[User:Kenner|Kenner]] 03:01, 11 April 2008 (GMT)
:::Still, even if the typos aren't fixed, should we really keep them in there? Consistency is important, but the changes were quite minor. Yes, it's the principle of the thing, but ... Meh. If you/Head Chroniclers don't want it changed, though, I'll gladly revert what I did! — [[User:Kenner|Kenner]] 03:01, 11 April 2008 (GMT)
::::I would actually prefer you beat those responsible for penning such atrocious works first and force them into submitting to making all the necessary corrections, but just maintaining the integrity (even if it is poorly spelled, consistency-devoid integrity) of the original documents is important and, sadly, enough. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 03:06, 11 April 2008 (GMT)
1,131

edits