1,131
edits
Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Pending Deletion"
Category talk:Pending Deletion (view source)
Revision as of 04:20, 27 January 2008
, 04:20, 27 January 2008how did that get there?
m (how did that get there?) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::You are also right about how incorrect uncapitalisations CAN NOT bring you to the correctly capitalised page, but I hope this doesn't mean we will reach a consensus to create a redirect from every possible incorrectly-uncapitalised entry in the search box! (Warlocks of the rising phoenix, Warlocks of the Rising phoenix, Warlocks of the rising Phoenix, oi!) I suppose how the wiki works is that it can pull you back (wrong capitalisation to right uncapitalisation) if you go too far with your search, but it cannot bring you a step forward (wrong uncapitalisation to right capitalisation) if you don't go far enough with your search. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 14:31, 17 September 2007 (GMT) | ::You are also right about how incorrect uncapitalisations CAN NOT bring you to the correctly capitalised page, but I hope this doesn't mean we will reach a consensus to create a redirect from every possible incorrectly-uncapitalised entry in the search box! (Warlocks of the rising phoenix, Warlocks of the Rising phoenix, Warlocks of the rising Phoenix, oi!) I suppose how the wiki works is that it can pull you back (wrong capitalisation to right uncapitalisation) if you go too far with your search, but it cannot bring you a step forward (wrong uncapitalisation to right capitalisation) if you don't go far enough with your search. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 14:31, 17 September 2007 (GMT) | ||
Please see the [[Special:DoubleRedirects|double redirects]] page. I'm pretty sure most of them are unnecessary to keep because, as is discussed above on this page, using incorrect capitalisations in the search terms is immediately corrected by the wiki - no redirect needed. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 22:29, 30 December 2007 (GMT) | Please see the [[Special:DoubleRedirects|double redirects]] page. I'm pretty sure most of them are unnecessary to keep because, as is discussed above on this page, using incorrect capitalisations in the search terms is immediately corrected by the wiki - no redirect needed. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 22:29, 30 December 2007 (GMT) | ||
---- | |||
As per [[AchaeanLore:Formatting]]: | |||
In order to create an article for a denizen, there must be an actual living interactive NPC. Being mentioned in text, | |||
in room descriptions or by other methods, would not qualify. It would be fine to place these individual in a larger | |||
article, such as a city article, instead. Also consider other categories such as the Historical Figures category. | |||
:the Korkill and Bailin articles ought to be deleted. In all honesty, from room descriptions alone, we don't even know if they are "alive", and thus we don't know whether they should be categorised as denizens or historical figures. I suggest just having the two of them mentioned in passing on the Ashtan page (as they are now) and leave it at that. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 22:35, 1 January 2008 (GMT) | |||
---- | |||
When a page is deleted, is the option presented of also deleting the associated Talk page (like it is to move an associated Talk page when you move an article)? --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 21:57, 26 January 2008 (GMT) | |||
:I don't think so, it should just destroy them, but it doesn't, which is lame. --[[User:Corvax|Corvax]] 22:45, 26 January 2008 (GMT) | |||
::There are sadly still countless of parent-page-less Talks out there. I guess at least now we know to keep that from growing. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 23:00, 26 January 2008 (GMT) | |||